Chhattisgarh Forest Department
NWFP Certification
|
Presentation by Dr. Arvind A. Boaz, Executive Director, Forest Development Corporation, Chhattisgarh. |
|
|
|
Dr. Boaz made a presentation titled
"Certification: Some Important Issues". He highlighted that before
certification, high value markets for such certified products should be
identified. Local and regional level certification standards should be drafted
with the help of all stake-holders. Certification should be repeatable,
independent, non-discriminary between forest types and ownership, nature etc.
this system of certification should have in-built channels to interact with more
established systems of certification so that in the long run, it can make a
balance between the interests of growers to end-users. |
He
began with indicating some of the critical success factors:
The
occurrence of NTFP is dispersed and collection is done by large fringe forest
area population. It would be beneficial to identify few species occurring in
large quantities over small areas ilike tikhur, aonla, safedmusli, kadu, chirayata etc., for which already large market exists and
the JFM Committees have been handling part of the trade and are conversant with
Good Management Practices (GMPs) of the produce.
Process certification would only be applied to specific species and for
production harvested from known areas like established PPAs primarily managed
for NWFP production.
Identify high value markets and purchasers willing to buy certified
organic products, before initiating process certification.
Draft local and regional level certification standards with the help of
all stake holders in the production to consumption chain in each species, area
and region. Such stake holders include the local collector, the Primary forest
produce cooperative societies, JFMCs, local knowledgeable persons such as the
Kochias, vaidhyas etc., professional foresters, agricultural and horticultural
scientists, ecologists, social scientists and traders. Such standards should be
widely circulated to national and international experts and certification
agencies for comments and then adopted.
Periodic evaluation of these standards.
It will be beneficial to have single issue labeling of forest products
derived from NWFP. This is defined as "a process which results in a claim
which may be used on-product referring to the quality of forest or forest
management at the origin of the raw material of which the product is made.
Labeling is based on certification of forest management and verification of
chain of custody. (ITTO, December 1997). Labeling on this basis is described as
'single issue' because it only covers forest management and takes no account of
other environmental impacts. This is internationally accepted and will help
entrepreneurs to market certified herbal products.
As far as exports are concerned, international linkages with other
certifying agencies should be developed so that our certification is accepted by
end-users of those countries. This will ensure raw material exported directly
through State Minor Forest Produce Federation to international pharmaceuticals
and food chains using NTFPs as their basic raw material.
Dr. Boaz concluded by stating, "If we are able to establish such a certification system, coupled with a benefit sharing mechanism, that is already in place in the state of Chhattisgarh, we will be able to put in place, a sustainable NWFP management system based on certification and benefit sharing mechanism, that is the need of the hour not only in Chhattisgarh, a fast developing densely forested tract, inhabited by a large indigenous population but also on the global level, where certification is gradually becoming the buzz word in green NWFP marketing."
The
first group was entrusted with evolving fair, average quality norms, which would
outline standard quality methods. For this, the group members deliberated upon
the Fair, Average Quality (FAQ) norms to be developed by the industries which
would provide a benchmark for the producers entailing requisitions from
industries for pre-determined specifications. The group therefore discussed the
various FAQs for various kinds of products. They considered the importance of
maintenance of a fair average quality for NWFP in the state.
The
Second group was given the topic titled "Quality Assurance through Lab
testing facilities". The group discussed all probable problems which could
arise during Lab testing of Minor Forest Produce to get prime price in National
as well as International market. According
to them, the minor forest produce resources are scattered in vast area with
geographic variation in quality. They said that there was a need for
prioritizing the minor forest produce for lab testing. For this, arrangements
should be made for ensuring availability of accredited laboratories where the
chemical tests may be conducted upon the MFP products. This would further
require ensuring acceptability of certification of the lab-testing to the
purchaser so that the certification may be credible and reliable. The group also
suggested that the expenditure on lab-testing is extremely high and involved
fairly high costs on the part of the producer. Therefore, lab-testing facilities
should be affordable in order to improve greater acceptability. The group also
considered serious issues such cheating and mal-practice and suggested that a
fool-proof system should be evolved to check for any irregularities at all
levels and corrective actions need to be put in place as well. It was
also mentioned that existing laboratory facilities comprising infrastructure and
skilled man-power will be used for getting products tested in the laboratories.
Efforts will be made to build the capacity of the lab technicians as per requirement for lab testing. The certification agency can facilitate the upgradation of lab facilities it uses for mutual benefit.
The third group was given the topic to discuss on "Forest Management Issues pertaining to Certification" The group considered prioritizing the potential species according to the three agro-climatic zones of the Chhattisgarh state. They deliberated upon the need for managing the forests on a sustainable basis through operationalizing broad strategic planning through intensive macro as well as micro level planning. It was suggested that the detailed micro plans involving Forest Protection Committees or Village Forest Committees needed to be developed. The group also discussed regarding making use of existing working plans that will have to be supplemented with inventory. The group also expressed the need for strengthening the working plans. The group mentioned about involving and ensuring community participation in the management of NWFP resources involving indigenous traditional heelers and medicinal practitioners that will address the socio-cultural framework. The group emphasized on the need for enhanced role and involvement of the local communities in planning, management and monitoring. This would also result in empowering community for benefit sharing subsequently resulting into capacity building for stakeholders such as the staff and the indigenous community.
Group four discussed on "Proposed Certification Process in Forest Management in Chhattisgarh". The group discussed on several facets of the certification process and recommended that an independent and autonomous institution needed to be established to undertake certification in the state. They discussed the Institutional framework, Institutional Structure and the Functions and responsibilities of the Institution.The members arrived at a consensus to the proposition for having a local certifying agency having representatives from the Growers, Industries, Committees / MFP collectors, University/Research Organizations, Chhattisgarh State Government, Autonomous bodies and expert individuals and NGOs
More details have been provided in Annexure-C.
|
Please click on the following figures to move onto the respective page - |
||||||||||||||
|
|20| |
||||||||||||||